South Korea will expand its crypto Travel Rule requirements from August 20, 2026, removing the current ₩1 million threshold for transfers between regulated platforms. The change means every transfer between domestic virtual asset service providers, or VASPs, will require the collection and sharing of sender and receiver information, no matter how small the amount.

The update targets a gap in anti-money laundering oversight identified by the Financial Services Commission, which said roughly 60% of transfers between local exchanges had been taking place below the existing threshold. According to the regulator, that left room for illicit actors to break larger movements into smaller transactions to avoid scrutiny.

Threshold removed for transfers between regulated platforms

Until now, South Korea’s Travel Rule obligations applied only to crypto transfers worth at least ₩1 million, or about $700. From August 20, that limit will no longer matter for transfers moving from one regulated exchange to another.

In practice, that means Korean platforms such as Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone and Korbit, along with other local VASPs, will have to exchange customer details for all qualifying transfers between regulated entities. The Travel Rule requires service providers to collect and transmit information on both the sender and the recipient as funds move between platforms.

Regulator says smaller transfers created an AML blind spot

The FSC said a majority of exchange-to-exchange transfers in the domestic market were occurring below the current reporting line. Its estimate of about 60% suggests the exemption covered a large share of everyday activity between platforms.

That, in the regulator’s view, created a weakness in anti-money laundering controls. By eliminating the threshold, authorities aim to reduce the chance that suspicious users could avoid detection by splitting transfers into multiple smaller transactions rather than sending one larger amount.

Personal wallets are not automatically treated the same way

The revised approach does not automatically place self-custody wallets under the same full Travel Rule process. Transfers between a Korean exchange and a wallet controlled directly by a user, such as a MetaMask or Ledger wallet, are instead expected to be handled through a risk-based framework.

Under that approach, exchanges may ask users to verify ownership of a wallet, request extra information in higher-risk cases, or increase monitoring when transactions show possible money laundering warning signs. The rules, as described, do not require every withdrawal to a personal wallet to be processed in the same way as a transfer between two regulated exchanges.

What remains outside the rule and what users may notice

The Travel Rule still primarily applies where regulated service providers are involved. In general, transfers between two personal wallets, or other on-chain movements with no VASP on either side, are not covered by the data-sharing requirement.

For most users, the visible experience may not change dramatically because exchanges already perform similar checks for larger transfers. Still, the broader requirement could mean identity checks for all exchange-to-exchange transfers regardless of size, and potentially more checks for self-hosted wallet withdrawals or transfers involving overseas platforms. The source article also noted the possibility of added time or cost, though the exact impact remains unclear.

Source: Coin Edition